Significance Of Non Importation Agreement
The non-import agreement expired on 1 January 1770. Many traders want to go out: they have warehouses full of British goods for sale and they are eager to resume their trade. Hoping to demonstrate their “fervor on the substance,” despite the offenders in their midst, Bostonians wrote to the Massachusetts colonial agent in London and assured him that they were as determined as usual to force the hand of Parliament. One of these deceptive importers was John Hancock, who was a merchant, statesman, and patriot of the American Revolution. He had the goods of his captains, prohibited by the agreement, transported. His ships carried cargo such as British flax or gunpowder. Another well-known trafficker was Samuel Adams, also a well-known American statesman, who later became one of the organizers of the Boston Tea Party. These smuggling practices have been not only an effective way to resist Britain`s high taxes and weaken its policy, but also a cheaper alternative for the desired goods. The illicit goods were purchased in particular by Dutch, French and Spanish traders and traders. Overall, Boston`s no-import agreement cannot be considered a great success.
First, few colonies had engaged in this boycott. For example, the southern colonies refused to participate in this initiative. Second, own interests, smuggling, and violations of the agreement by many Boston traders and traders further undermined the initiative. The Boston Non-Import Agreement of August 1, 1768 was a formal collective decision of Boston-based merchants and merchants not to import or export objects to the United Kingdom. The agreement, essentially a boycott, was a series of trade restrictions agreed upon by the settlers with respect to trade with the metropolis. The agreement was made to protest and fight the Townshend Revenue Act of 1767. According to the Townshend Revenue Act, a tax was to be paid for the purchase of glass, lead, oil, paint, paper and tea. The Boston Non-Import Agreement was one of the most effective means of colonial resistance to British policy in the years leading up to the American Revolution. A similar tactic was used again five years later in Boston and throughout the colonies to protest the Tea Act with the British East India Company`s tea boycott, which culminated in the Boston Tea Party.
Boston traders and traders have reduced their imports of British goods by almost half….
October 16, 2021
October 15, 2021